Over the past decade, hundreds of universities across the United States have begun establishing a number of unique and common practices that are energy efficient, cost-cutting, and especially friendly to the environment. What is particularly interesting about this eco-revolution is that it is being fueled by not only administrations but also students as well, as both sides push each other to further their environmental investment. It is this relationship that continues the environmental push seen in universities today.
University administrations are cutting down costs and carbon emissions with common practices, like going paperless and replacing the usual incandescent light bulb with LEDs and compact fluorescents. However, many colleges and universities are going above and beyond these common yet effective actions by modifying and constructing campus buildings to meet LEED-certified standards. Furthermore, as environmental science programs become increasingly popular among students, colleges and universities are creating new programs and majors focused on the environment. For example, Wesleyan University, in Connecticut, created the College of the Environment (COE) in 2009 to “develop informed citizens who can discuss environmental issues from a variety of disciplinary perspectives, understand their connections to social or political issues, and derive well-formulated independent conclusions.” The COE is special, but it is certainly not alone among American high education institutions. From the very best at Harvard and Yale and all the way down, colleges and universities are putting similar programs into place.
At the same time, students are leading their own environmental initiatives, and though oftentimes smaller scale, they are nevertheless making a impact on the student body and their surrounding natural and intellectual habitat. Numerous colleges, like Kenyon, Wesleyan, University of Texas-Arlington, Middlebury, and many, many more are establishing composting programs for students. These encourage students to take the responsibility of their own ecological footprint and also put them in the mindset of creating an environmentally-minded routine. Other campaigns like those calling for shorter showers, reduced power usage, and housing specifically dedicated to the environment also further encourage students to take responsibility.
The actions of college and university administrations and student bodies not only reflect each other’s, but also reflect a growing investment in energy efficiency and environmental awareness. While university leaders are saving thousands of dollars on energy costs and encouraging young minds to intellectually explore environmental issues, students are groups, programs, and initiatives dedicated to increasing awareness about similar issues. Though we oftentimes pit administrations and student bodies against each other, the two sides are actually supporting and pushing each other to invest for the future.




Our last blog post discussed the impact of national investment in creating disruptive energies, and rather coincidentally, our next topic to discuss relates quite well with it. As we mentioned before, the Space Race in the 1960s brought about significant development to the computer and software industry, and it appears that many other NASA projects are also having beneficial by-products. An oxygen generator intended for a scrapped NASA Mars program has led to the commercial production of the Bloom Box, a fuel cell that combines oxygen and fuel to create cheap and clean power. In 2010, after an additional $400 million in private investment, the Bloom Box has been put on the market, and several large corporations like Google, Starbucks, and FedEx have quickly jumped at the opportunity to save on energy costs and promote an environmentally friendly image. A year later, the popularity of this product appears to be growing. 
A recent New York Times article reported that the Obama administration is pushing for new gas mileage and emission standards that is stirring debate in Washington and the auto industry. The proposed new regulations would require all new cars and trucks to reach a fuel efficiency of 56.2 miles per gallon by the year 2025. While this is roughly double the present standard and requires a fuel efficiency increase of 5% a year between 2017 and 2025, the new standard would cut global warming emissions by millions of tons per yer and oil imports by billions of barrels. The higher domestic fuel efficiency would not only save consumers billions of dollars at the pump but would also put it on par with those of competitors in Europe, China, and Japan. Increasing fuel efficiency to reduce auto emissions and dependence on foreign oil is a major facet to Obama’s energy plan and a seemingly beneficial progression for consumers and the environment, but automakers aren’t quite ready to bite just yet.
In mid-2009, Google and Microsoft released two separate, although very similar, energy monitoring applications. Google PowerMeter and Microsoft Hohm allowed people to monitor their home energy intake online in real-time and learn about ways to save energy around the house. It was hoped that through using the product, users would become more conscious about their energy use and in turn become more energy efficient. However, if you now go to their blogs, you will likely see these messages:

